Piping Details
Pipe shoes, guides, anchors, low points, branch connections, steam tracing, vertical penetrations and insulation terminations.
ERATHERM combines risk-based CUI surveys, targeted insulation removal, qualified NDT coordination and corrosion-prevention insulation design to identify hidden damage and reduce recurring moisture-related corrosion in piping, tanks and process equipment.
CUI develops when water, oxygen and contaminants reach the metal surface beneath an insulation system. Jacketing may appear serviceable while localised corrosion, pitting or cracking progresses out of sight.
The external appearance of insulation is evidence to assess—not proof of the metal condition beneath it.
CUI risk is rarely uniform. Inspection locations should be selected from operating conditions, geometry, exposure, history and consequence—not by random insulation removal alone.
Pipe shoes, guides, anchors, low points, branch connections, steam tracing, vertical penetrations and insulation terminations.
Nozzles, manways, skirts, support legs, vessel heads, removable covers and transitions between insulation and fireproofing.
Washdown zones, firewater exposure, coastal environments, damaged seams, thermal cycling and locations with recurring leakage.
The programme converts asset data and field observations into focused inspection, verified findings and practical mitigation workpacks.
Materials, temperatures, age, coating history, insulation system, previous findings and maintenance records.
Probability drivers, consequence, environmental exposure, accessibility and operating scenarios.
Jacketing condition, open seams, penetrations, leakage, cold spots, supports and moisture-entry paths.
Appropriate screening followed by targeted stripping at selected high-value inspection locations.
Surface assessment and defined NDT with data captured against the asset and inspection location.
Owner disposition, repairs, coating release, prevention detailing, re-insulation and final QA/QC.
No single inspection technique is universally suitable. Selection depends on component geometry, insulation thickness, access, expected damage, required resolution and plant constraints.
Screening identifies where to investigate. It does not automatically establish the remaining integrity of the asset.
| Method | Primary purpose | Important technical boundary |
|---|---|---|
| External visual survey | Locate damaged jacketing, open joints, staining, leakage and high-risk details. | Does not directly reveal the metal condition beneath insulation. |
| Infrared thermography | Screen for thermal anomalies and possible wet-insulation zones. | An anomaly is not direct proof of corrosion or remaining wall thickness. |
| Pulsed eddy current (PEC) | Estimate and screen for metal loss through suitable insulation systems. | Results are affected by geometry, supports, lift-off and insulation configuration. |
| Profile radiography | Assess selected piping profiles and potential wall loss. | Limited by component size, access and radiation-safety requirements. |
| Guided-wave UT | Screen longer piping lengths and prioritise indications. | It is a screening technique, not a substitute for precise local thickness measurement. |
| Targeted stripping + visual/UT | Directly examine the exposed substrate and verify thickness at selected points. | Requires controlled removal, surface access and compliant reinstatement. |
Risk information can be mapped to isometrics, P&IDs, equipment drawings or site layouts, creating a controlled bridge between assessment, field access and work execution.
Online access, shutdown-only work, scaffolding and special-access requirements can be layered onto the same inspection plan.
CUI cannot be controlled by selecting one insulation material alone. Coating, insulation, jacketing, joints, penetrations, drainage, maintenance access and workmanship must operate as one engineered system.
No insulation material, coating or cladding component can independently guarantee that CUI will not occur. The engineering objective is measurable CUI risk reduction and control.
The assessment focuses on coating breakdown, water and oxygen entry, wet/dry cycling, general or localised corrosion, pitting and measurable wall loss.
The review additionally considers chloride contamination, moisture concentration, temperature exposure and external chloride stress corrosion cracking.
ERATHERM connects the field finding to an executable insulation solution, maintaining traceability from controlled opening through close-out.
Define high-risk locations, access needs, likely quantities, NDT interfaces, materials and execution workpacks before the critical path begins.
Coordinate insulation removal, NDT access, repair interfaces, coating release, redesigned insulation details and high-volume reinstatement.
Use suitable online surveys and screening to prioritise interventions, preserve records and prepare the next planned outage.
Deliverables are adapted to the facility, inspection strategy, integrity workflow and execution phase.
Applicable editions, owner requirements and jurisdictional rules are confirmed for each project. References support engineering judgement; they do not replace an asset-specific inspection plan.
CUI/CUF design, maintenance, inspection and mitigation framework.
System approach to corrosion control beneath thermal insulation and fireproofing.
Qualification testing of protective coating systems under insulation.
Relevant chemistry and ESCC evaluations for insulation associated with stainless steel.
Corrosion under insulation is hidden deterioration that develops when water, oxygen or contaminants reach a metal surface beneath an insulation system. It can affect carbon steel and, through different mechanisms, susceptible stainless steels.
The insulation and outer jacketing conceal the substrate. A system may appear acceptable externally while corrosion, pitting or cracking develops below the insulation.
Risk often concentrates at damaged seams, penetrations, terminations, low points, pipe shoes, supports, nozzles, valves, flanges, manways, washdown areas and locations exposed to thermal cycling or recurring leakage.
Thermography can help screen for thermal anomalies or possible wet insulation, but it does not directly prove corrosion or determine remaining wall thickness. Indications require appropriate follow-up.
Not at every location. Risk assessment and suitable screening can prioritise areas, but targeted insulation removal is normally required where direct examination and precise verification are necessary.
No. CUI control depends on the complete system: substrate coating, insulation, jacketing, seams, penetrations, drainage, thermal movement, access and installation quality.
The design should limit water entry and retention, use compatible materials, protect the substrate, shed weather correctly, accommodate movement and provide maintainable details at supports, penetrations, terminations, valves and flanges.
The finding is documented and assessed through the owner’s integrity process. Required NDT and repairs are completed, the approved coating is released, and the insulation is reinstated using reviewed CUI-mitigation details.
Yes. ERATHERM can provide an integrated scope covering CUI risk assessment, inspection planning, controlled insulation access, NDT coordination, prevention engineering, field application, QA/QC and close-out documentation.
Share your asset register, operating temperatures, previous findings or turnaround scope. ERATHERM can define the inspection basis, access strategy, prevention details and reinstatement package.
